|
|
THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN NEW JERSEY
SUBMITS TESTIMONY TO THE CHAIRPERSONS OF
THE SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
Given March 18, 2003
County College of Morris
Randolph, New Jersey
Testimony Provided by
Cathy Chin
Mental Health Association in New Jersey
Good morning
Co-Chairperson Bryant, Co-Chairperson Littell and members of the
Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee. My name is Cathy Chin
from the Mental Health Association in New Jersey a member of the
Coalition for Vulnerable Citizens and the Mental Health Coalition.
Budgets represent moral and social choices, not just economic ones,
the Governor’s proposed budget reflects a policy that the state
bears responsibility for children and adults with mental illness,
and will accept that responsibility even in difficult fiscal times.
The Governor showed what he cares about and stands for and we thank
him for taking this position.
While the budget did propose increases to Redirection II and the
Partnership for Children, it proposed cuts to Medicaid, Family Care,
and Housing. We are concerned that these cuts may negatively impact
our constituents.
Redirection II
We fully support the Governor’s proposal to fund Redirection II.
This program has been the result of strong advocacy on our part for
many years to reform the state mental health system from one in
which consumers are institutionalized in state hospitals, to one
where less expensive services are present in the community.
Consumers’ experience has been that in institutions, they rarely
recover. However, in the community with the right supports,
consumers thrive and recover.
If not fully funded, we can expect an increase in the number of
unnecessary and costly hospitalizations, disruption to people’s
lives, families, and work.
We urge you to retain Redirection II at the current proposed funding
level and to resist proposals that would apply those state funds
elsewhere.
Partnership for Children
We are grateful to know that the Governor’s proposed budget includes
increased funding which will see a federal match of $1.3 million.
This initiative has been successfully implemented in a number of the
state’s counties, where it has helped families with children
exhibiting mental health symptoms to provide the necessary
coordination of parents, providers, teachers and case managers.
The Partnership also increases the amount of services. Nationwide,
there is a serious dearth of the kind of settings and supervision
children require to get better. There are usually two extreme
alternatives. On one end there might be a weekly 1-hour appointment.
On the other end is long-term residential treatment for a few.
There’s not enough in between. And if problems are not identified
early, those who have long-untreated illnesses become the most
difficult and the most costly to treat.
Finally, DYFS, whose primary function is to protect children and the
Partnership for Children, whose primary function is to provide the
best system of care and services for emotionally disturbed children,
go hand in hand. Both programs must be funded. Have one without the
other and tragedies will continue to occur.
We strongly urge you to keep the Partnerships proposed budget
funding level. Please help us to continue to build a more
accessible, flexible and comprehensive foundation of care for
children who show signs of mental illness.
Medicaid, Fee for Service
-
Addition of $3.00
co-payment for all medications and outpatient visits. Mental
health consumers in the community often exist on extremely tight
budgets and take multiple medications. When forced to choose between
drugs and visits to doctors, or housing and food, many make the
decision to try to “go without them.” Invariably this decision leads
to decompensation, destabilization and, many times,
re-hospitalization.
-
Addition of $25
co-payment for non-emergency uses of emergency rooms. There is a
lack of services for mental health consumers in the community. This
is why Redirection II is so important. When coping strategies don’t
work and consumers have no other services to turn to emergency rooms
are often the only place to go. During a psychiatric crisis, it may
be difficult for the consumer to ascertain whether or not s/he is
experiencing a true emergency. Mental health consumers must not be
penalized for periods when their judgment is poor or for the lack of
alternatives to emergency rooms.
-
Elimination of dental
coverage for adults. The drugs mental health consumers must take
to manage their illness are extremely powerful and affect the body’s
ability to maintain healthy teeth and gums.
-
Preferred Drug List (PDLs).
We are strongly opposed to limiting the prescriber’s use of mental
health drugs. Psychiatric medications are non-interchangeable. For
many, it has taken years of trial, error, symptoms and suffering to
arrive at the right drug.
Continuing Community
Services
Staff who spend the majority of their workday providing direct
hands-on intervention to clients will not receive a Cost of Living
Adjustment. Because of the 24% vacancy rate, they can’t always
respond in a timely fashion to consumers in need. Continued staff
shortages may mean more consumers will be hospitalized,
incarcerated, or displaced.
Family Care
There is an overrepresentation of mental health related issues among
the poor.
Like most of the uninsured, since they are not sick enough or poor
enough to access the public mental health care system, they will not
receive services, unless they pay out of pocket. Most will choose to
“go without” and hope their symptoms will not escalate to the point
where they will have access more expensive mental health care
services. In addition, the economic and emotional disruption to
their families and work life will compound a crisis.
Affordable Housing
$25 million in HMFA reserves will be given to the general treasury
to offset the budget gap which would mean that about 1000 units of
affordable housing would not be built this year.
People with mental illness who live in unstable environments and
poor housing conditions have increased emergency room visits,
symptoms of schizophrenia and depression, and in-patient
hospitalizations.
Housing for consumers is, among other things, a preventative and
cost-effective measure.
Our mental health system, both for children and adults, remains
severely under-funded and has great difficulty meeting people’s
needs. Children and adults with mental illness need the opportunity
to heal in the “least restrictive setting,” need their direct care
service workers to be well-trained and consistent in their lives,
need Medicaid and Family Care structured and available so that they
can access treatment services before a crisis, and need a decent and
stable place to live.
Back to
top |