|
2007 Candidate
Survey
1. Do you have any experience,
either personally (as a family member, friend, etc.) or professionally with
people with mental illness? If so, how has that experience affected your views
on policies relating to mental health?
2. Members of Congress and all Federal
employees enjoy mental health insurance parity--health insurance coverage
that ensures that mental health and substance abuse benefits are on par with
coverage for other medical care. MHANJ led the effort to pass parity
legislation in 1999, but since then has worked with a statewide coalition of
advocates working to improve that law.
Senator Vitale’s (D-17) bill, S807,
passed the Senate in December. Its companion in the Assembly, A2512, sponsored
by Assemblyman Gordon (D-25) needs only a full vote in that house and the
Governor’s signature to become law.
S807 and A2512 improve New Jersey’s
current law by ensuring that employer-sponsored health insurance plans reimburse
beneficiaries for all mental health illnesses documented in the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual – Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), for substance abuse treatment and
services, and for services received by children with serious emotional
disturbances whose doctors have not yet diagnosed a biological component.
Will you support A2512 when it comes
to the floor?
3. If elected, will
you support legislation to remove language in our state constitution referring
to people with mental illness as “idiots or insane”? Will you likewise support
efforts to register, educate, and get out to vote people living with
mental illness by requiring the state Division of Elections to send Voter
Opportunity information to all treatment settings? Will you require education
of all citizens working at county polling places about the rights to vote of
people with mental illness?
4. Some mental
health advocates believe that New Jersey should pass an Involuntary
Outpatient Commitment law, which would allow judges to order into community
treatment people with mental illness who meet a very broad standard of
dangerousness to themselves or others. MHANJ opposes this policy and has been
working to block the passage of such a law in the state. To date, the Senate
version of the bill, S1093, has passed in the Senate, and the Assembly version,
A2304, has been introduced in the Assembly and referred to the Assembly Human
Services Committee. Will you oppose A2304?
5. What initiatives
will you propose and promote to support efforts to improve access to, and
funding for, community-based services for people living with mental
illness?
6. Will you support
efforts to include new funding in the budget of the Division of Mental Health
Services (DMHS) to improve our state and county psychiatric hospitals by
addressing overcrowding, lack of quality treatment and increases in violence
occurring in those hospitals?
7. Each year since
2001, the Governor proposes a budget for the upcoming year that has historically
included co-payments for Medicaid beneficiaries. Fortunately, each year
advocates have been successful in removing this from the final budget passed in
June. With such a difficult budget anticipated for FY ’08-’09, will you support
efforts to find alternative ways to balance the budget than to impose co-pays on
the state’s most vulnerable citizens?
8. What steps will
you take to increase employment opportunities for people with mental
illness and promote awareness among potential employers of the abilities these
individuals possess?
9. What commitment
do you plan to make to children with mental illness, specifically with
regard to programs and funding to help all children get screening and
coordinated treatment for mental and emotional disturbances?
10. What changes
would you make to improve access to, and funding for, treatment for persons with
co-occurring mental illness and addictions, including alcohol, illegal
drugs and tobacco?
11. Increasing
numbers of persons living with mental illness are ending up in jails and
prisons, after having been arrested for “nuisance crimes.” Once
incarcerated, they often go without adequate mental health services, and upon
release receive very poor follow-up treatment and services. Would you help us
add diversionary programs to our system, which would direct persons living with
mental illness into supervised community services rather than into
incarceration? For those who do end up in jail or prison, how will you increase
state funding for mental health services and discharge planning?
12. How will your
administration support efforts to provide culturally competent services to
minority populations in NJ?
13. What
commitment will you make to support efforts to improve access to treatment for
mental health consumers in rural areas of NJ?
|